PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 65, No. 1, January 1985, pp. 31-34

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kirby, R L.
Right arrow Articles by Creaser, G. A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kirby, R L.
Right arrow Articles by Creaser, G. A
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Research

Usefulness of Footprint-Sequence Analysis in Lower-Limb Amputees

R Lee Kirby, Jane F Stewart-Gray and Gail A Creaser

Dr. Kirby is Associate Professor, Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Dalhousie University, c/o Nova Scotia Rehabilitation Centre, 1341 Summer St, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4K4 (Canada).
Mrs. Stewart-Gray, at the time of this study, was Staff Physical Therapist with the Department of Physiotherapy and the Clinical Locomotor Function Laboratory of the Nova Scotia Rehabilitation Centre. She is currently with the Arthritis Society Home Care Physiotherapy Program in Shelburne, Nova Scotia.
Miss Creaser is Staff Physical Therapist with the Department of Physiotherapy and the Clinical Locomotor Function Laboratory of the Nova Scotia Rehabilitation Centre.

Clinicians evaluated the usefulness of footprint-sequence analysis in 25 lower-limb amputees who were all prostheses wearers. The patients walked at a comfortable speed with their usual walking aids along a 2.24-m footprint-recording strip. Each patient's physical therapist and physician indicated on visual-analogue scales how useful they judged both raw and derived data to be in problem solving and as documentation for future comparison. Both groups of clinicians found this type of analysis moderately useful. We found no significant difference, but moderate correlation (r = .61, p < .01), between their estimates of usefulness for problem solving and for future documentation. They considered the derived data slightly, but significantly, more useful than the raw data (t = 4.20, p < .001). We found no significant difference or correlation between the estimates of physical therapists and those of physicians. The clinicians ranked pressure distribution, stride width, step length, foot angle, and stride length in order of perceived usefulness. Footprint-sequence analysis appears to be a moderately useful adjunct to the evaluation and documentation of the walking problems of lower-limb amputees. Both raw and derived data should be made available to the physical therapists and physicians caring for these patients.

Key Words: Amputees • Gait • Physical therapy


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
D. Porter and V.C. Roberts
Review article : A review of gait assessment in the lower limb amputee Part 1: Temporal and kinematic analysis
Clinical Rehabilitation, February 1, 1989; 3(1): 65 - 74.
[PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American Physical Therapy Association.