PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 63, No. 9, September 1983, pp. 1404-1413

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wolf, S. L
Right arrow Articles by Binder-Macleod, S. A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wolf, S. L
Right arrow Articles by Binder-Macleod, S. A
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Research

Electromyographic Biofeedback Applications to the Hemiplegic Patient: Changes in Lower Extremity Neuromuscular and Functional Status

Steven L Wolf and Stuart A Binder-Macleod

Dr. Wolf is a senior investigator at the Emory University Rehabilitation Research and Training Center, 1441 Clifton Rd NE, Atlanta, GA 30322 (USA) and Associate Professor, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, and Assistant Professor, Departments of Anatomy, Surgery and Community Health Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Mr. Binder-Macleod was a research associate, Emory University Regional Rehabilitation Research and Training Center when this paper was written, and is now a doctoral student, Department of Physiology, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298.

The efficacy of EMG biofeedback in improving neuromuscular and functional measures of involved lower extremities in an Experimental Group of chronic stroke patients (n = 7) was examined. Differences in pretreatment-posttreatment measures of the Experimental Group were compared with those of groups of chronic stroke patients receiving no treatment (n = 6), biofeedback treatment of the involved upper extremity only (n = 16), and general relaxation training (n = 8). All examinations were performed in a blind fashion. The Experimental Group showed significant improvement in active range of motion at the knee and ankle that appeared to result from increases in EMG output to muscles governing these movements. Experimental patients did not improve substantially in walking speed over different terrains but did require significantly fewer or less complex assistive devices to walk. Limitations in the design and implementation of this study are provided, and suggestions for future investigation are offered.

Key Words: Biofeedback • Cerebrovascular disorders • Hemiplegic • Leg • Rehabilitation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
R. T. Katz
Management of Spastic Hypertonia After Stroke
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, January 1, 1991; 5(5_suppl): S5 - S12.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
HEALTH AND PUBLIC POLICY COMMITTEE and AMERICAN COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS
Biofeedback for Neuromuscular Disorders
Ann Intern Med, June 1, 1985; 102(6): 854 - 858.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1983 by the American Physical Therapy Association.