PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 62, No. 3, March 1982, pp. 304-308

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bohannon, R. W
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bohannon, R. W
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Practice

Whirlpool Versus Whirlpool and Rinse for Removal of Bacteria from a Venous Stasis Ulcer

Richard W Bohannon

Mr. Bohannon was Staff Physical Therapist, Wake County Medical Center, Raleigh, NC, when this study was conducted. He is currently a master's degree candidate, Division of Physical Therapy, Department of Medical Allied Health Professions, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27514 (USA).

The number of bacteria removed from a venous stasis ulcer by whirlpool treatment alone and that removed by whirlpool treatment followed by vigorous rinsing were compared. A single subject received the whirlpool treatment followed by the rinse on 12 separate occasions. The number of bacteria removed was determined by taking samples of the whirlpool water after the subject's whirlpool treatment and again after rinsing the subject's ulcer over the whirlpool. The samples were cultured on agar plates. By calculating the number of bacterial colonies on the plates, the number of bacteria removed by each treatment was determined. The whirlpool treatment followed by vigorous rinsing was found to remove more than four times as many bacteria as the whirlpool treatment alone. Though performed on a single subject, this clinical pilot study suggests that vigorous rinsing of a contaminated ulcer following removal from the whirlpool can remove additional bacteria.

Key Words: Hydrotherapy • Infection control • Skin ulcer


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ptjournalHome page
K. A Luedtke-Hoffmann and D S. Schafer
Pulsed Lavage in Wound Cleansing
Physical Therapy, March 1, 2000; 80(3): 292 - 300.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1982 by the American Physical Therapy Association.