PTJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


PHYS THER
Vol. 61, No. 3, March 1981, pp. 351-353

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, J. L
Right arrow Articles by Smidt, G. L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, J. L
Right arrow Articles by Smidt, G. L
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Clinical Reports

Quantitative Gait Evaluation in the Clinic

James L Robinson, MA and Gary L Smidt, PhD

Mr. Robinson is Associate Professor, Physical Therapy Program, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29403 (USA).
Dr. Smidt is Professor and Director, Programs in Physical Therapy Education, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242.

The purpose of this paper is to present a clinically feasible method to provide objective, quantitative information regarding the quality of a patient's gait. The technique used is simple and economical and requires minimal equipment. The four basic temporal and distance factors are 1) stride length, 2) step length, 3) cadence, and 4) velocity. The technique requires the following equipment: 1) grid pattern, 2) stop watch, 3) portable tape recorder, 4) tape measure, 5) marking pen, and 6) masking tape. Case examples are provided to demonstrate the use of the data obtained.

Key Words: Gait • Evaluative studies • Physical therapy


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ptjournalHome page
S. L Wolf, P. A Catlin, K. Gage, K. Gurucharri, R. Robertson, and K. Stephen
Establishing the Reliability and Validity of Measurements of Walking Time Using the Emory Functional Ambulation Profile
Physical Therapy, December 1, 1999; 79(12): 1122 - 1133.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
S E Lord, D T Wade, and P W Halligan
A comparison of two physiotherapy treatment approaches to improve walking in multiple sclerosis: a pilot randomized controlled study
Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 1998; 12(6): 477 - 486.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
S E Lord, P W Halligan, and D T Wade
Visual gait analysis: the development of a clinical assessment and scale
Clinical Rehabilitation, February 1, 1998; 12(2): 107 - 119.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
B. Tamlin, K. McDonald, M. Correll, and M. H. Sharpe
The Immediate Effects of Vestibular Stimulation on Gait in Patients with Parkinson's Disease
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, January 1, 1993; 7(1): 35 - 39.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
J. Young, P. Perkins, S. Atkinson, and M. Chamberlain
Initial experience with a telemeterized gait analysis system
Clinical Rehabilitation, August 1, 1989; 3(3): 205 - 209.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
M. E. Tinetti and S. F. Ginter
Identifying Mobility Dysfunctions in Elderly Patients: Standard Neuromuscular Examination or Direct Assessment?
JAMA, February 26, 1988; 259(8): 1190 - 1193.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1981 by the American Physical Therapy Association.